Post Publication Discussion Policy

Indiktika: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika is committed to promoting transparency, academic integrity, constructive scientific dialogue, and continuous improvement in scholarly publishing. The journal recognizes that scholarly evaluation continues after publication and encourages constructive discussion, critical evaluation, and responsible communication concerning published articles in mathematics education.

This post-publication discussion policy is guided by the principles of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and aims to maintain the accuracy, credibility, and integrity of the scholarly record.

1. Purpose of Post-Publication Discussion

Post-publication discussion provides opportunities for researchers, lecturers, teachers, students, and other readers to critically evaluate published articles, exchange scientific perspectives, and contribute to the development of knowledge and practices in mathematics education.

The objectives of this policy are to:

  1. Encourage constructive and evidence-based scientific discussion.

  2. Promote transparency and accountability in published research.

  3. Facilitate clarification of research findings, methodologies, data analysis, and interpretations.

  4. Identify potential errors, inconsistencies, or ethical concerns in published articles.

  5. Maintain the accuracy, credibility, and integrity of the scholarly record.

2. Mechanisms for Post-Publication Discussion

The journal welcomes scholarly comments, critical discussions, and evidence-based responses concerning articles published in Indiktika: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika.

Post-publication discussions may be submitted via the journal's official email address: indiktika@univpgri-palembang.ac.id.

Submissions must clearly identify the article being discussed, including its title, authors, year of publication, and DOI or article URL, if available. Submissions should also provide a clear explanation of the issues raised, together with supporting evidence or relevant references, where appropriate.

The editorial board will evaluate each submission to determine whether it is suitable for further consideration, communication with the original authors, or publication. The editorial board may request additional information or clarification before making a decision.

3. Guidelines for Scientific Comments

All post-publication comments must comply with the following principles:

  1. Comments must be scientifically relevant, constructive, and supported by appropriate evidence.

  2. Discussions must focus on the research content, methodology, data analysis, interpretation, or scientific conclusions.

  3. Personal attacks, discriminatory statements, defamatory language, and inappropriate remarks are prohibited.

  4. Comments must respect research ethics, confidentiality, intellectual property rights, and applicable publication policies.

  5. Potential conflicts of interest must be disclosed.

  6. Comments must not contain fabricated evidence, misleading information, or unsubstantiated allegations.

  7. Statements concerning potential errors or research misconduct must be presented responsibly and supported by relevant evidence.

The editorial board reserves the right to decline comments that do not meet these standards.

4. Editorial Evaluation and Follow-up Actions

The editorial board will assess post-publication comments and responses based on their scientific relevance, supporting evidence, and compliance with the journal's publication ethics policies.

If a discussion identifies a potential error, inconsistency, or ethical concern, the editorial board may contact the authors and, when necessary, request supporting data, documentation, or further clarification.

Depending on the nature and seriousness of the issue, the journal may take appropriate editorial action in accordance with its publication ethics policies. Such actions may include publishing a correction or retracting an article when justified by sufficient evidence.

All decisions will be made carefully and fairly, with the aim of preserving the integrity of the scholarly record.

5. Ethical Standards and Confidentiality

All participants in post-publication discussions, including authors, commentators, editors, and reviewers, are expected to maintain professional conduct and adhere to the principles of academic integrity.

The journal will handle all submissions responsibly and respect confidentiality where applicable. Personal information and confidential materials will not be disclosed without an appropriate basis.

Post-publication discussions must serve the purpose of improving scholarly understanding and maintaining the quality and integrity of published research.

6. Contact and Submission

Readers who wish to submit comments, questions, or requests for clarification concerning a published article may contact the editorial office of Indiktika: Jurnal Inovasi Pendidikan Matematika via email at indiktika@univpgri-palembang.ac.id.

All submissions will be considered in accordance with the journal's editorial procedures and publication ethics policies. Submission of a comment does not guarantee its publication.